Free speech shield


Arguments on a Monday afternoon

I'm about to tell you about one of my secret vices.

Every once in a while when I am really frustrated, I will go pick an argument with a "fundy" type. Not necessarily a religious fundamentalist, these days it is usually political or economics. It's not something I am particularly proud of, but I really enjoy the debate. Especially when it is a principle I do believe in.

Yesterday was one example. A certain Chicago reporter was arguing for a Federal shield law for journalists. It's a topic I've dealt with before. Although I am certainly not the only blogger who has done so.

The bottom line is that when government makes exceptions to the law, that shows the law wasn't good to begin with.

Laws should be uniform and universally applied.

Why do politicos and journalists get exemptions to free speech restrictions before elections?

Because the free speech restrictions are bad law and unconstitutional besides, no matter what the court says.

Why did Congress for decades exempt itself from the labor regulations it inflicted on the rest of the nation?

Get the picture?

If someone needs shielding from the law, it's bad law.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Tue - November 27, 2007 at 04:21 AM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library



Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved