eHarmony reluctantly complies


Another example of why I despise identity politics

I really don't understand the fuss about this one.

eHarmony is a private company. A lawsuit forced them to provide a service that they hadn't provided.

Now unless I have been misinformed all these years, gay means you're not interested in dating straights.

So someone tell me why a separate service is unacceptable?

I guess what really bothers me about this is that it fails the handy-dandy parity test.

What would the reaction be if an exclusively gay dating service was required by court decree to provide a service to straights?

I'm all for equal rights. I am dead set against special rights.

— NeoWayland

Posted: Fri - March 20, 2009 at 11:46 AM  Tag


 ◊  ◊   ◊  ◊ 

Random selections from NeoWayland's library



Pagan Vigil "Because LIBERTY demands more than just black or white"
© 2005 - 2009 All Rights Reserved